Finance organisations can meet DORA requirements faster by automating risk controls, embedding governance into data workflows, and reducing dependence.
DORA compliance is difficult for finance and insurance organizations that still manage risk, governance, and reporting through manual processes. The fastest path to compliance is to automate controls, embed governance into data management workflows, and reduce operational dependence on inflexible vendors. This matters because DORA raises the standard for how BFSI firms manage resilience, incidents, third-party risk, and data accountability.
To make matters worse, each new regulation forces both existing and newly produced data to be compliant. It creates a massive headache and tech debt for data management teams, as they rush to find all this data and make it compliant.
This cyclical process repeated on January 17, 2025, when DORA started being applied. That means that BFSI corporations have scrambled or still are, making their databases DORA-compliant.
DORA affects far more than banks alone. It applies across the financial ecosystem, including insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, crypto-asset service providers, and critical ICT third parties. That broad scope means compliance must extend across internal operations, external vendors, and the digital dependencies that connect them.
The regulation instilled change in over 20 different types of financial entities and ICT third-party service providers, including:
The Banking and Financial Services Industry is increasingly connected and even a tiny data breach can affect the entire global system, not unlike the systems shutdown that ground 8.5 million Windows devices to a halt. A couple of minutes of downtime can cost millions, not to mention the reputation of all affected businesses.
DORA's scope is not only to counteract these types of incidents in the financial sector but also to prevent them. It's meant to manage ICT risks in BFSI to ensure prevention, resistance, response, and recovery from any disruption.
With DORA, the EU aims to create a more secure financial system prepared for today's world of digitalization and interconnectedness.
With these categories in mind, the affected corporations have too much on their plate. And that plate will keep getting fuller because of the numerous extra tasks, checks, and transformation programs that abound. Let's look at how the affected categories will challenge BFSI corporations.
The regulations imposed by DORA will have a waterfall effect on specific roles and their workloads within the industry.
First in line are the compliance officers and risk management teams. Compliance frameworks, new regulatory requirements, and ICT risk assessment are only a few of the extra tasks about to spring up.
Second are the IT and cybersecurity teams. With them lies the all-important responsibility of implementing the technical requirements. They will install and maintain security measures for the ICT systems. They will also conduct regular resilience tests, and develop systems for detecting, reporting, and responding to incidents.
Thirdly, the Digital Operational Resilience Act will affect Data Management teams. Data inventorying and classifying will be crucial to enable proper prevention, identification, and mitigation, while another pile of regular cleaning and updating await. Consistent monitoring and reporting of any breaches and non-compliance will offer little sleep to these teams.
Last, but not least the regulations will affect Legal and Contract teams. Reviewing, updating, and negotiating contracts while ensuring legal compliance will add to their to-do lists.
Teams will have to ensure:
BFSI enterprises will have to ensure that their data, no matter who handles it, will follow the provisions of the act. This includes third-party providers managing and preserving data in DORA-compliant locations, under EU regulator supervision. It also includes strict data dissemination rules for third-party providers.
The tech vendor landscape is diverse with hundreds if not thousands of tools available at a click of a button. The incoming compliance tidal wave of DORA will impose strict rules on tech vendors.
Some of these rules will affect them so much that it will require BFSI enterprises to pivot from them.
Companies should prepare for this to avoid scrambling at the last minute to find a new vendor. Such a scenario could prove catastrophic, delaying other processes that can snowball into more non-compliance, resulting in fines.
Another key aspect is diversifying tech vendors. Aligning with the EU's anticompetitive strategy, vital services provided by third parties must not be monopolized. The provided services must be transferable between providers while any SLA must be customized according to DORA's guidelines. This will ensure that even if a vendor fails for some reason, the entire ecosystem remains resilient.
DORA's regulations perfectly align with our philosophy of being technology agnostic.
This approach focuses on practices and implies an easy pivot from any technology if it doesn't suit your data and business needs.
To properly address the workload, database, and vendor issues, BFSI enterprises need to automate these processes. As much as technology increases the threat levels that have led to DORA in the first place, so too does it offer the solution through automation.
Here's what BFSI enterprises can do to automate their processes.
DORA comes into force
Public consultations held on first batch of policy products and their resulting policy mandates
Call for advice on criticality criteria and fees
Public consultations held on the second batch of policy products, joint feedback from ESA on these, as well as the results of these consultations
First batch of policy products delivered
Second batch of policy products delivered
Application of DORA
Oversight on compliance with DORA
While the regulation itself does offer guidelines and has held consultations with business stakeholders, the required transformations are more complicated than they seem (and that's saying something).
As the regulation has permitted companies to prepare in two years, each company's timeline for compliance is variable.
This depends on multiple factors such as technologies used, data management practices, data production teams, data consumers' experience in accessing required data, and so on. Such a transformation program focused on compliance with DORA could take anywhere between 6 months and 3 years.
Here's how Witboost helps you quickly become DORA compliant with minimal to no overhaul of your data infrastructure while integrating with your own tech stack.
Witboost enables the definition and enforcement of policies to ensure coherence between declarations and production implementations, including SLA and SLO checks.
It seamlessly integrates metadata, metrics, and policies from your data catalog, offering a unified experience across the data production process.
This ensures that BFSI corporations can safely test their ICT systems, controls, and processes and manage third-party risk.
What's more, standardizing and governing data management processes automatically with Witboost will ensure documented policies, procedures, and controls for ICT Change Management are respected. Take full control of every change and save valuable time by recording, testing, assessing, approving, implementing, and verifying. All this is within the same user interface.
DORA's regulations perfectly align with our philosophy of being technology agnostic.
Witboost imposes enterprise-wide computational governance rules to act as guardrails to better control the lifecycle of data, wherever it resides.
Using computational policies that act at deploy time and runtime, it effectively uses a policy-as-code approach. These policies are non-bypassable so all produced data will be 100% DORA compliant.
The above data governance framework is called Governance Shift Left.
Any risk of data corruption, unauthorized access, and technical flaws is fully reduced if the right policies are put in place. These guardrails will prevent any breaches from happening and will double-check your data.
Technology agnosticism is one of the core pillars of Witboost. And that remains true for any third-party vendor thanks to its interoperability via APIs and webhooks. This approach offers full flexibility, thus avoiding lock-in and helping comply with the DORA-mandated multi-vendor strategy.
Human errors increase proportionally to the number of tasks and working time. The guardrails put in place by Witboost come via templates that automate the data production process. They help avoid any manual errors while developing a data project. These guardrails help speed up processes and ensure data quality, so you don't have to manually check for errors.
DORA compliance is not just a regulatory demand. It is a test of whether finance and insurance organizations can operationalize resilience across data, technology, and third-party dependencies. The organisations that handle it best are the ones that automate controls, embed governance into delivery workflows, and build enough flexibility to adapt to future regulation without starting over.
Discover how Witboost can safeguard your organization by becoming DORA-compliant and AFR-compliant (Any Future Regulation). Take a look at the platform below.
The Witboost team reimagined software development by locking themselves in a room for two days to create a workflow that challenges traditional...
Data Mesh is completely changing the perspective on how we look at data inside a company. Read what is Data Mesh and how it works.
The 8-week production plan is structured with clear phases, defined deliverables, and leaves your team ready to take ownership by the end.